SEMRush Ranking Factors 2017 Cause A Stir

What’s this about Website Ranking Factors?

I applaud SEMRush for publishing their SEO Website Ranking Factors Study, even if it caused a bit of a kerfuffle in SEO land.

I think it’s great when big toolsets use their processing power to produce information which is insightful and useful.

Read more in this extract from TWIS SEO News & Updates 17th November 2017.

#SEO #SEONews #RankingFactors #SERP


SEMRush Website Ranking Factors 2017 Cause A Stir

Key Issues Summary:

  • SEMRush has released its second ranking factor study for the year, listing what it believes to be the 17 most important ranking factors.
  • The data was pulled from 600k keywords and analysed against a different statistical analysis from pure correlation.
  • The starkest conclusion was that direct traffic was the most important ranking factor.
  • This caused a bit of a stir in the SEO community!

SEMRush Ranking Factors 2017 Cause A Stir

How to use SEMRush Website Ranking Factors:

  1. Head to SEMRush and download the full study. It is interesting reading.
  2. Read it with a weather eye and understand its limitations.
  3. The top 4 ranking factors are products of great content. Think about that.
  4. And then build great content, which people want to engage with, read more of, which meets user needs.
  5. Click here to contact me to discuss how to interpret the SEM Rush Ranking Factors report.

Website Ranking Factors Insights & Discussion:

I’ve got immense respect for people who put out these studies, even when they suspect they may get pilloried because of them.

As I’ve posted elsewhere, levels of Direct Traffic  are not a prerequisite for ranking well in organic search. To truly establish that you would have to consider all websites’ Direct Traffic levels and then consider how many of them perform well, and how many of them don’t. It’s likely as many sites with huge volumes of Direct Traffic perform poorly.

It is, however, an indicator that you are likely to perform well, because big, popular sites tend to build more links, tend to accrue more mentions and, generally, tend to be expected to appear in search results. Google has made it plainer over the years that users have certain expectations that certain websites will appear in SERPs and have engineered their algorithms to facilitate that.

As I say above, the top 4 factors of direct traffic, time on site, pages per session and bounce rate are factors of great sites with great content, so if you really want to take something away from the study, you should be looking at building a great site with great content which really focuses on the user first, middle and last. Everything else is secondary.

That said, if Google only focused on popular sites, then their rankings would become a popularity contest where only the biggest brands which can reach the most people could rank. And we really don’t want that. It’d be like DMOZ all over again.

More Information on Ranking Factors:

Return to Top


The State of SEO Mid-2017 Released

The State of SEO Mid 2017

We recently released the super-exciting The State of SEO in mid-2017. Read it now.

Return to Top


TL;DR

Thanks for reading. If you would like to discuss what these changes mean for your web property, or would like to know how to implement them, please feel free to contact me.

Return to Top